<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for  &#187; Ghostbusters II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zarban.com/?feed=comments-rss2&#038;cat=11" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zarban.com</link>
	<description>Movie &#38; TV commentaries from anybody</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:23:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ghostbusters II by crazyman</title>
		<link>http://www.zarban.com/?p=2811&#038;cpage=1#comment-7070</link>
		<dc:creator>crazyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 05:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zarban.com/?p=2800#comment-7070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s great that there&#039;s another commentary about discussing how under-rated this film is.  Like dvdcommentaries&#039;s other franchise commentaries this uses the film as a starting point point to discuss all things Ghostbusters including the cartoon and video games. 

It is however the second best Ghostbusters II commentary as I think the RCUK commentary is just a bit superior, but there&#039;s no shame in that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great that there&#8217;s another commentary about discussing how under-rated this film is.  Like dvdcommentaries&#8217;s other franchise commentaries this uses the film as a starting point point to discuss all things Ghostbusters including the cartoon and video games. </p>
<p>It is however the second best Ghostbusters II commentary as I think the RCUK commentary is just a bit superior, but there&#8217;s no shame in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ghostbusters II by Dorkman</title>
		<link>http://www.zarban.com/?p=8116&#038;cpage=1#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zarban.com/?p=13614addb69310d9e4b14b6bfe323e4b1edcab429d74b2a4a6dcccf44b3b7cce476cf#comment-2288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be fair, this was recorded before AVATAR was released. If and when we commentate that film, you&#039;ll find we agree with you. As of the GB2 commentary, we were merely defending the point that theoretically, there&#039;s nothing wrong with it if done well. Just kinda wasn&#039;t, turns out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, this was recorded before AVATAR was released. If and when we commentate that film, you&#8217;ll find we agree with you. As of the GB2 commentary, we were merely defending the point that theoretically, there&#8217;s nothing wrong with it if done well. Just kinda wasn&#8217;t, turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ghostbusters II by Zarban</title>
		<link>http://www.zarban.com/?p=8116&#038;cpage=1#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>Zarban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zarban.com/?p=13614addb69310d9e4b14b6bfe323e4b1edcab429d74b2a4a6dcccf44b3b7cce476cf#comment-2286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great commentary from Down in Front on the less-than-awesome sequel. They try to rewrite the movie and write Ghostbusters 3. There&#039;s a hilarious discussion of whether you should worship a talking painting immediately or somewhat later. Major nerdery thruout. (Boys, you&#039;re scaring the straights.)

I agree that it&#039;s okay for Avatar to basically be Dances With Wolves (and The Last Samurai; and Pocahontas; and Fern Gully) in space, but it&#039;s a lousy version of it. The characters are cardboard cutouts (mean general; greedy industrialist; caring scientist; native princess; etc.) and the pacing is slow as hell. It takes an hour-and-a-half to get to step 2 of the protagonist&#039;s mission (get natives to leave). Worse, the aliens look like blue people with appliances on their noses—why even do CG characters?

&lt;i&gt;The Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations&lt;/i&gt; mentioned by Trey is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archive.org/stream/thirtysixdramati00polt#page/n3/mode/2up&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;available in full online&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great commentary from Down in Front on the less-than-awesome sequel. They try to rewrite the movie and write Ghostbusters 3. There&#8217;s a hilarious discussion of whether you should worship a talking painting immediately or somewhat later. Major nerdery thruout. (Boys, you&#8217;re scaring the straights.)</p>
<p>I agree that it&#8217;s okay for Avatar to basically be Dances With Wolves (and The Last Samurai; and Pocahontas; and Fern Gully) in space, but it&#8217;s a lousy version of it. The characters are cardboard cutouts (mean general; greedy industrialist; caring scientist; native princess; etc.) and the pacing is slow as hell. It takes an hour-and-a-half to get to step 2 of the protagonist&#8217;s mission (get natives to leave). Worse, the aliens look like blue people with appliances on their noses—why even do CG characters?</p>
<p><i>The Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations</i> mentioned by Trey is <a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/thirtysixdramati00polt#page/n3/mode/2up" rel="nofollow">available in full online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ghostbusters II by Zarban</title>
		<link>http://www.zarban.com/?p=2811&#038;cpage=1#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>Zarban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zarban.com/?p=2800#comment-1510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good stuff from DVDC.co.uk. They like it perhaps a bit more than it deserves, but that&#039;s better than hating it more than it deserves. There&#039;s a really good discussion of the use of color in film.

Ben Stein&#039;s name is pronounced &quot;stine&quot; rather than &quot;steen.&quot; He had his own gameshow in Comedy Central for a while where he was a permanent contestant and Jimmy Kimmel was the host.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good stuff from DVDC.co.uk. They like it perhaps a bit more than it deserves, but that&#8217;s better than hating it more than it deserves. There&#8217;s a really good discussion of the use of color in film.</p>
<p>Ben Stein&#8217;s name is pronounced &#8220;stine&#8221; rather than &#8220;steen.&#8221; He had his own gameshow in Comedy Central for a while where he was a permanent contestant and Jimmy Kimmel was the host.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
